🎗️

ECOG Performance Status

Evaluate functional status and ability to perform daily activities in cancer patients.

🎗️

Assess ECOG

Select the level that best describes the patient

📊

What is ECOG Performance Status?

ECOG Performance Status (ECOG PS), also known as WHO Performance Status or Zubrod Score, is a scale developed by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group to assess functional status in cancer patients. The scale ranges from 0 (fully active) to 5 (death), quantifying the patient's ability to perform daily activities and self-care. It is a fundamental tool for: 1) Assessing eligibility for chemotherapy protocols, 2) Stratifying prognosis, 3) Monitoring disease progression, 4) Standardized multidisciplinary communication, 5) Documentation in medical records and clinical research.

📋

How to Use ECOG Performance Status?

To assess ECOG PS: 1) Observe the patient and obtain history about daily activities, 2) Ask about: ability to work, need for rest, self-care ability, time spent in bed/chair, 3) Select the category that best describes the patient's current state, 4) Record ECOG PS in medical records with assessment date, 5) Reassess periodically, especially before therapeutic changes. IMPORTANT: If uncertain between two levels, choose the worse (higher number). Assessment should reflect functional status related to cancer disease, not limitations from other comorbidities (e.g., severe arthritis).

🎯

Detailed ECOG Levels

ECOG 0 - Fully Active

Able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction. No evidence of disease. Performance equivalent to pre-disease state.

ECOG 1 - Mild Symptoms

Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out light or sedentary work.

ECOG 2 - Symptomatic, Ambulatory >50% of Time

Capable of self-care but unable to carry out any work. Up and about >50% of waking hours.

ECOG 3 - Symptomatic, In Bed >50% of Time

Limited self-care capability. Confined to bed or chair >50% of waking hours.

ECOG 4 - Completely Disabled

Completely unable to self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair.

ECOG 5 - Death

Patient deceased.

🏥

Clinical Applications of ECOG

Treatment Eligibility

ECOG 0-1: Generally eligible for intensive treatments (combination chemotherapy, complex surgeries). ECOG 2: Consider less toxic regimens, dose reduction. ECOG 3-4: Generally not candidates for systemic treatment; consider palliative care or best supportive care.

Prognostic Stratification

ECOG PS is one of the most important independent prognostic factors in oncology. ECOG 0-1 is associated with better overall survival and quality of life. ECOG 3-4 indicates poor prognosis. Used in composite prognostic scores (e.g., IMDC for renal cancer).

Response Monitoring

Improvement in ECOG PS during treatment indicates favorable response. Progressive deterioration may indicate disease progression or treatment toxicity, requiring reassessment of therapeutic strategy.

Clinical Research

Inclusion/exclusion criteria in clinical trials. Used for patient stratification in analyses. Allows comparison between different studies and populations.

⚖️

ECOG vs Karnofsky Performance Status

While both assess functional status, there are important differences:

ECOG (Scale 0-5)

  • Simpler and faster to apply
  • 6 well-defined ordinal categories
  • Widely used in modern oncology
  • Lower inter-observer variability
  • Preferred in current clinical trials

Karnofsky (Scale 0-100)

  • More granular scale (11 levels in increments of 10)
  • Historically more used in neuro-oncology
  • Greater subjectivity in choosing between close levels
  • Still used in some specific protocols

Conversion: Approximate conversion: ECOG 0 = KPS 90-100, ECOG 1 = KPS 70-80, ECOG 2 = KPS 50-60, ECOG 3 = KPS 30-40, ECOG 4 = KPS 10-20.

💡

Tips for Accurate Assessment

  • Ask the patient directly about activities in recent days
  • Observe general appearance, gait and alertness level during consultation
  • Consider caregiver reports if patient has cognitive impairment
  • If uncertain between two consecutive levels, choose the worse (higher number)
  • Always reassess before starting new chemotherapy cycle
  • Document ECOG changes over time in medical records
  • Don't let a single non-oncologic comorbidity determine ECOG
⚠️

Limitations and Important Considerations

1) **Subjectivity**: There may be variability in interpretation between different evaluators. Training and standardization are important. 2) **Comorbidities**: Difficult to differentiate limitations from cancer disease vs other conditions (heart disease, arthritis). 3) **Fluctuation**: Functional status may vary day to day. Record the most recent and representative assessment. 4) **Culture and Context**: Concepts like 'light work' may vary culturally. 5) **Not Multidimensional**: Does not capture specific quality of life domains (pain, anxiety, nutrition). 6) **Performance ≠ Isolated Prognosis**: Should be interpreted together with other factors (tumor type, stage, biomarkers, response to previous treatments).

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Topics

  • Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS)
  • Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale
  • Comprehensive geriatric assessment in oncology
  • Palliative care in oncology
  • Eligibility criteria for clinical trials
  • Chemotherapy toxicity and dose adjustment

Scientific References

  1. 1. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5(6):649-655.
  2. 2. Sorensen JB, Klee M, Palshof T, Hansen HH. Performance status assessment in cancer patients. An inter-observer variability study. Br J Cancer. 1993;67(4):773-775.
  3. 3. Buccheri G, Ferrigno D, Tamburini M. Karnofsky and ECOG performance status scoring in lung cancer: a prospective, longitudinal study of 536 patients from a single institution. Eur J Cancer. 1996;32A(7):1135-1141.
  4. 4. Ma C, Bandukwala S, Burman D, et al. Interconversion of three measures of performance status: an empirical analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(18):3175-3183.
  5. 5. Kelly CM, Shahrokni A. Moving beyond Karnofsky and ECOG Performance Status Assessments with New Technologies. J Oncol. 2016;2016:6186543.